Skip to content

Conversation

@woodruffw
Copy link
Member

From conversation in psf/policies#41 -- I've moved this into the PyPI user docs instead. I think the "project management" hierarchy is the best place for it, since we have similar policy-like stuff under it already (like quotas and yanking).

I've left the page verbatim from that other PR, which also means it doesn't really read exactly like the language in the other pages (it's more PEP-y). I wasn't sure how much I should edit it for style given that it's standard language 🙂

xref #17999 for additional context on what's motivating this.

CC @Thespi-Brain @ewdurbin @miketheman from the original PR

Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@astral.sh>
@woodruffw woodruffw requested a review from a team as a code owner October 2, 2025 15:54
@woodruffw woodruffw self-assigned this Oct 2, 2025
@miketheman
Copy link
Member

Generally looks good to me, assigning to @Thespi-Brain for a deeper review.

Copy link

@Thespi-Brain Thespi-Brain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@miketheman miketheman merged commit 5f7e35c into pypi:main Oct 23, 2025
21 checks passed
@miketheman miketheman deleted the ww/pep541-import branch October 23, 2025 13:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants